In my experience, Quakers don't much like to talk
about governance. As I write this, however, I am in the process of
putting together written material for my Area Meeting's annual
report, so governance comes to my mind.
I think Friends don't like it much because of the
implications it carries in terms of authority and control, but that's
not what it's used to mean in the context of organisational
governance. Governance is about how decisions are made, and we have
our own vital Quaker traditions in that regard. It's also about how
records are kept, how we communicate, and how we take all the
decisions that, for legal or practical reasons, can't be taken by the
Meeting in session.
